Centad LOGO
  
   Home      RSS/XML Feed      Contact      Site Map      Donation  
ABOUT CENTAD MEDIA & NETWORK PROGRAMMES DEMYSTIFYING TRADING PUBLICATION

Talking Trade: Post-Bali Roadmap

Future Climate Negotiations: Role of Civil Societies

Dr Atiq Rahman is a noted environmental activist from South Asia, and a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) representing Bangladesh. He and his senior colleague Mr Khandaker Mainuddin share with Centad the inputs from the COP 13, Bali, December 2007.

Centad: The LDCs are the most vulnerable group of countries to the climate change impacts. What should be the foundation principles for global trade regulations to address the linked challenges of development and climate change?

Dr Atiq Rahman & Team: WTO framework should treat the LDCs especially those that are vulnerable to climate change impacts as distinct or special group. Studies may be undertaken to identify the sectors that would be affected due to climate change and assess the negative impacts on employment, poverty and trade balance situation of vulnerable LDCs. All goods and services from the LDCs should be allowed access without tariff and non-tariff barriers. In addition to goods and services, labour force from LDCs should be allowed entry on temporary and permanent basis into countries having shortage of labour. Imports from LDCs should not be restricted on grounds of safeguard measures adopted by developed countries. Special fund to help LDCs may be created through imposing levies on export and import of fossil fuels by the developing and developed countries.

Renewable energy technologies should be transferred to LDCs on preferential terms and made available to the poorer sections of society.

Centad: It has been observed that the recent policies are biased in favour of mitigation than adaptation. But it has also been observed that adaptation is a better option for the LDCs to evolve a sustainable development. How does an effective adaptation policy benefit the trade performance of the LDCs?

Dr Atiq Rahman & Team: It is true that adaptation is a better option than mitigation for the LDCs. However, LDCs should not be deprived of mitigation opportunities that could be availed by the poor nations. LDCs should be encouraged to take part in CDM activities through capacity building and they could be offered preferential terms for emission reduction. A higher price for unit reduction of GHGs could be offered to LDCs.

With regard to adaptation, LDCs should be provided with infrastructural facilities such as air, rail and road networks for trade facilitation. The building of such infrastructures should take into consideration the long-term effect of climate change. As most of the LDCs are producers of primary goods and raw materials, adaptation should give more emphasis on exportable agricultural crops and forest resources. Investment in forest resources especially in the low-lying coastal belt can serve both adaptation and mitigation purposes as well as preservation of biodiversity.

Blurb: Market access for the current LDC product should be ensured. LDCs need to be provided with technical assistance to comply with the voluntary standards and technical regulation imposed by the developed importing countries. Trade among LDCs should expand through south-south cooperation

Centad: Trade in general is envisioned to play supportive role to capacity development through technology transfer and economic diversification. But the threat of imposing environmental regulations can impede the expansion of trade. What do you think are the avenues that the LDCs should emphasise during negotiation to safeguard their trade interests?

Dr Atiq Rahman & Team: The sheer size and the subsistence nature of the economy is a real barrier to economic diversification for the LDCs in the short-run. Market access for the current LDC product should be ensured. LDCs need to be provided with technical assistance to comply with the voluntary standards and technical regulation imposed by the developed importing countries. Trade among LDCs should expand through south-south cooperation. This may be achieved through formation of new trade blocks or regional trade organisation if this cannot be achieved under the WTO framework.

Centad: The LDCs require huge financial support to undertake any climate-friendly initiatives. How can an effective multilateral framework be developed in this regard?

Dr Atiq Rahman & Team: Energy (fossil fuels) starved LDCs should be provided with energy-efficient and renewable energy technologies, based on their comparative advantages for different renewable sources. Special adaptation fund may be created under the UN system (may be with UNEP) for LDCs. The fund should be made available on flexible terms and without international bureaucratic control and formalities.

Centad: How can a conducive environment be created to implement the climate-friendly policies benefiting trade and development in the LDCs? Do the present frameworks of trade and climate change ensure the attaining of such goal(s)?

Dr Atiq Rahman & Team: Climate issues need to be further integrated with WTO and UN systems. The role of civil society in trade and development issues should be acknowledged. Equity and fairness at international and regional levels should be a major focus under a new paradigm encompassing both trade and development.

The present framework of trade and climate change has major shortcomings to ensure that goals are attained. Significant policy reforms are needed in all areas of trade, climate change and development.

  • Dr Atiq Rahman is Executive Director, BCAS, and Khandaker Mainuddin is Fellow, BCAS.

  • Dr Atiq Rahman can be contacted at atiq.rahman@bcas.net

March 21, 2008

 
top
 Print this Article
  Email this page 
 Archives 

 
 
  More Focus Articles  
Impending Food and Development Crisis: Lessons Still not Learnt
GM Food and Precautionary Approach - Thoughts to Ponder.
Gender Dimension of Unorganised Manufacturing Sector in India
The Doha Deal: High optimism can be risky
Copenhagen Climate Treaty Draft: A welcome intervention towards a meaningful Copenhagen Summit
Draft Report on ‘Trade Sustainability Impact Assessment Study of the EU-India FTA’ (ECORYS): A review from the Indian Perspective
Summary of Commerce Secretary’s Speech Expressing Serious Concerns over Generic Seizures and Anti-counterfeiting campaigns against Indian Pharmaceutical Products
Fake Drugs in India: Points to Ponder
Global Financial Crisis: Implications for India
The Legal and Policy Rationale of Pre-grant Patent Oppositions in India
Indo-EU Free Trade Agreements:Opportunities and Challenges for Indian Telecommunication Sector
The Differentiation COP Ends with Indecisions and Big Questions
Heavy Dependence on Trade for Food can prove Dangerous
It is Time to find Durable Solutions to Food Crisis
Tariff Cuts will impact Labour Intensive Industries
Economists Call for Deep Reforms of Global Financial System
India to Demand Greater Resource Allocation towards Climate Change
North-South Differences Marked the Opening Days of Climate Talks
Core Component of Patents System for Better Health
‘AAA’ matters, be it Finance or Food!
Critique on Public Funded R&D Project Bill: Indian version of US Bayh Dole Act
Dying Skill and Starving Weavers: The crisis of Banarasi Handloom
Do imports cool off or fuel food prices?
A Better Agricultural Text: still a long way
The Slippery Slope of Negotiations at the IGWG on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property
Soaring world food prices and volatility: Can trade break the jinx?
Volatility in Food prices: Futures caused the market manipulation
Exchange Rate Instability & Exporters: Reflection on trade policy
SPS-related Market Access Barriers in the EU: India Must Address its Concerns under the Proposed FTA
Draft Anti-Dumping Agreement – Critique of Selected Issues
A Balanced Development Round in Agriculture still a distant dream
Diversifying Indian Machine tool Production: Key to Sustainable Trade Competitiveness
Draft NAMA Modalities Text: Development Concerns Still Remain Neglected
The Novartis case
Novartis’ response: A reality check
Agriculture sector policy must be coherent with trade policy: Prabhu Pingali
Strengthening and enforcing anti-trust law can make a difference: Alexandra Spieldoch
The Draft Modalities Text on NAMA: A Critique
Indian cotton farmers face deeper crisis
South Asia needs to adopt best practices in regulation: Saman Kelegama
Developed countries are playing duck-and-dive: Yash Tandon
Towards a smoother transition to organic farming
Compulsory licensing: Suggestions for change
Special Economic Zones: padding gains, discounting losses
Aid-for-trade: Bonanza for consultants, nothing for development: J Michael Finger
Aid-for-trade: Country ownership crucial: Miguel Rodriguez Mendoza
Least development-friendly outcomes expected from NAMA negotiations
TRIPS-related issues of the Doha Work Programme
Impasse in agriculture negotiations: lack of process and substance
Mashelkar Committee report: A critique
S&DT for developing countries--New approach needed: Chandrakant Patel
Credibility of DSB seems reasonably well established: John H Jackson
Developing countries disadvantaged in the WTO: Prof B S Chimni
The WTO and protectionism -- Back to the future?
RTAs and BTAs present many challenges: Jo Leadbeater
North-South RTAs reinforce existing inequalities: Jayati Ghosh
Data exclusivity: Public interest must be kept before profit
Use of biological resources or Traditional Knowledge: Additional disclosure proposed
Special products flexibility a legitimate demand
Linking sensitive products with special products is like comparing oranges with apples
The death of the ABI alliance
Indian cotton farming at the crossroads
 
 
Centre for Trade & Development |A1/304 Safdarjung Enclave| New Delhi 110029
Tel: +91-11-41459226 Fax: +91-11–41459227
© Copyright 2005-10 Centad | Disclaimer
Registered under Societies Act as Consortium for
Trade and Development