enter your email address  
 Home   RSS/XML feed   Contact   Sitemap
 
 
  
    
Anti-dumping protection: Who gets it?
Anti-dumping is used by a small number of countries not to ensure that world trade is fair and competitive, but to create monopolies and favour large firms particularly in large and concentrated industries, argues this Centad working paper.
More
Protection of Geographical Indications: An overview of select issues with particular reference to India
The Centad working paper tracks the negotiating history of TRIPS in search of the origin of GI-related (Geographical Indications) provisions and provides a cogent account of various contours of WTO negotiations on GI to date. It also analyses the Indian GI Act in light of the TRIPS provisions.
More
GATS negotiations and India: Evolution and state of play
This working paper tracks the evolution of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) negotiations since its inception, and provides a concise overview of the current state of negotiations. The paper covers key issues under the purview of the GATS from an Indian perspective, and makes important policy suggestions for India on certain sensitive sectors.
More
Ensuring adequate flexibility through Special Products: A case study of India
While the Hong Kong Declaration allows self-designation of Special Products (SPs), this paper discusses how SPs should be designated and categorised.
More
Industrial tariffs and South Asia: Interpreting for development
An analysis of tariff reduction modalities in Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) in light of the Hong Kong Ministerial Declaration.
More
Agriculture and NAMA negotiations: Searching for the landing zone
This Centad working paper takes a critical look at the Hong Kong Ministerial text on agriculture and NAMA. On the basis of this analysis, the paper suggests specific and important negotiating points for developing countries.
More
NAMA tariff negotiations: What are South Asia's best options?
WTO negotiations on Non-Agricultural Market Access (NAMA) are about resisting hasty liberalisation in the South and dismantling excessive protectionism in the North. For India and Pakistan, the Girard formula for tariff reduction may be the best option if a non-linear approach is adopted. But this would still mean a steep reduction in tariff rates. India and Pakistan should use this as a bargaining chip and ask for compensation.
More
Contract farming for agricultural development
Contract farming can benefit local producers if the contracts are correctly structured and monitored. The Indian experience suggests the need for alternative institutional mechanisms if contracting is to be used as a development tool.
More
How long can the G20 hold itself together?
The Group of 20 (G20), which includes India and Pakistan, has emerged as a formidable negotiating bloc in the WTO. It has successfully questioned existing agricultural trade rules that hamper the interests of developing countries. However, there are crucial internal and external contradictions and pressures that it must resolve if it is to continue voicing the interests of developing countries.
More
Agricultural subsidies and negotiations: Strategies and options
Agricultural subsidies are the big sticking point in WTO negotiations. This paper traces how agricultural negotiations have played out in the Agreement on Agriculture and the July Framework. It suggests negotiating options for India in the run up to the Hong Kong Ministerial in December 2005.
More
Tackling non-tariff barriers
Negotiations on non–tariff barriers have received little attention. Yet, as tariffs decline, NTBs will be used more to protect domestic trade. This paper explains two of the most contentious NTBs for India: Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures and Technical Barriers to Trade.
More
 
top
 
Print this Article
  Email this page  
  Archives  
 
 
Centre for Trade & Development |A1/304 Safdarjung Enclave| New Delhi 110029
Tel: +91-11-41459226 Fax: +91-11–41459227
© Copyright 2005-08 Centad | Disclaimer
Best viewed in 800 X 600 resolution / Website developed and managed by Compare Infobase Limited